Everybody will agree: December is not the best choice for a trip to scandinavia. Especially because of climatic conditions. But anyone being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize cannot really avoid a trip to Oslo on December 10. So will President Obama, honored this year by the Norwegian Nobel Committee for creating "a new climate in international politics". Once in Oslo, why not extending the trip to another Scandinavian city ? Precisely at the same period of time, Copenhagen will offer the most appropriate tribune for any newly awarded Nobel Prize laureate willing to "take (his) share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges". So how could President Obama avoid attending the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on December 7-18, 2009 ?. But, if Oslo is the city of honors, "Copenhagen" actually stands for commitment. So, when preparing his speech for Oslo, President Obama shall also ensure that his country commitments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and developing countries program funding will meet the expectations. Of course, that makes the job somehow harder especially because the US Senate usually doesn't have to review a Nobel Prize award speech.Nobody really knows yet whether President Obama will succeed before his trip to Scandinavia and therefore deserve to receive his Prize. But, what is for sure is that, by selecting such a laureate the very day the Bangkok climate negociations failed, the Norwegian Nobel Committee already deserves a prize in applied machiavellism.




Version Française 